though, about other content, namely book reviews, that sit unchanged for years even though the reviewer might have second thoughts. Would it be fair or ethical to revise those reviews because the critic has rethought his or her opinions?The question arose after I read James Wood's dismissive critique of Richard Powers' new novel, "Generosity," in the New Yorker.
from Bob Hoover: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: Do-overs: Internet's treasure
~~~~~~~~~~~
No comments :
Post a Comment